Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Halpern, Santos & Pinkert, P.A. Attorneys at Law Florida Personal Injury Attorney
  • Free Confidential Consultation
  • ~
  • No Fee Unless You Win

Housekeeper Sues Chris Brown After Dog Attacks Sister

Dog13

Attorneys representing Chris Brown are asking the court to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the sister of a dog attack victim who was performing cleaning services at Brown’s residence. This is known as a witness bystander claim. Someone who witnesses a terrible event can file a lawsuit against the negligent party for trauma related to the experience. Such lawsuits may have merit in other states, but Florida mostly quashes these. In this article, we’ll take a look at the allegations and how they would play out in a Florida courtroom.

Negligent infliction of emotional distress 

Bystander claims are filed on a theory of negligent infliction of emotional distress. For example, let’s say that someone causes the death of your loved one and you are forced to witness it. While that is a terrible event that will change your life forever, the Florida courts don’t allow such actions to move forward unless you are physically injured as a result of your emotional grief.

In one case, a mother watched her daughter die in a car accident and shortly thereafter suffered a fatal injury due to shock. The courts allowed the action to move forward against the plaintiff on the grounds that the mother would not have died if she didn’t witness her daughter’s death. The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff by the Florida Supreme Court.

In the lawsuit filed against Chris Brown, Brown’s defense team is arguing that the woman was in another room when the dog attack occurred and thus was not a bystander to the attack at all, but only heard her sister’s screams. She should thus be denied the right to file a bystander action against Brown’s estate. Brown has further argued that because both sisters were workers, the claim should be routed through workers’ compensation and not the tort system.

The impact rule 

The court is more interested in preventing lawsuits from clogging up the system than they are about anyone’s feelings. Hence, why these lawsuits are prevented. If you could sue every time someone hurt your feelings, then the courts would be clogged up with such lawsuits. So the court requires that there is a demonstrable physical injury accompanying the emotional injury. However, the physical injury can result from the emotional injury. Nonetheless, it is much easier to file claims on a theory that a physical injury has led to an emotional injury than vice versa. This also precludes most bullying claims from being filed unless there is a physical injury involved.

Florida’s rule would have prevented this lawsuit from reaching a jury.

Talk to a Florida Personal Injury Attorney Today 

Halpern, Santos & Pinkert represent the interests of injured plaintiffs in lawsuits against negligent defendants. Call our Florida personal injury lawyers today to schedule a free consultation and learn more about how we can help.

Source:

rollingstone.com/music/music-news/chris-brown-dog-bite-lawsuit-response-1326242/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation